« Interested in Wellness? | Main | James Webb Young's technique for producing ideas »
| 14/11/06 | | What kind of facilitator are you? |
At the upcoming Australian Facilitators conference I’m looking forward to the “Facilitator Archetypes” workshop that I’m running alongside a great cartoonist, Simon Kneebone. This workshop was inspired from some work we did earlier this year exploring language in facilitation. When I asked “what metaphor describes your style of facilitation” I had no idea it would result in such an interesting collection of characters. Characters like; The invisible facilitator. Facilitator as chameleon. Facilitator as dictator. Facilitator as conductor. Thanks to Simon, we have translated our initial findings into some great cartoons that capture these characters. I can’t wait to see what characters emerge from our workshop!
Figure 1. The invisible facilitator
Figure 2: Facilitator as Chameleon
Figure 3: Facilitator as Dictator
Figure 4: Facilitator as Conductor
Figure 5: Facilitation is like moving with the elements and sailing the seas
Figure 6: Facilitation is like a parent holding a bicycle and then letting go
What metaphor describes your style of facilitation?
Send this entry to:
Email this entry to a friend
View the Technorati Link Cosmos for this entry
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.anecdote.com.au/cgi-bin/mt-tback.cgi/565
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What kind of facilitator are you?:
» Dictator, conductor, chameleon ... facilitator from Designing for Civil Society
Just as participation is about culture as much as tools, I believe facilitation is about style as much as technique. But like culture, that's difficult to explain. Andrew Rixon of Anecdote has given us an excellent start in What kind [Read More]
Tracked on November 15, 2006 8:39 PM
Comments
Great piece, Andrew. On a good day, I'd like to be an invisible one, but if I'm honest, I'm rarely that. Somewhere between facilitator as fool and parent letting go.
Although at some conferences, I've veered close to dictator mode...
Posted by: Tony Quinlan at November 15, 2006 2:35 AM
Thanks for sharing the great cartoons, I'll tag them!
Are you talking about f2f, online or both? Is there a difference according to you? I worked with an experienced f2f facilitator, who worked for the first time online, and it's amazing how easy it was for him.
Greetings, Joitske
Posted by: joitske at November 16, 2006 2:26 AM
Hi Joitske,
Thanks for your comments!
The characters came from a survey where we invited facilitators to describe what metaphor described their style of facilitation. The facilitators who took part, worked on the whole as f2f facilitators. We have a paper which we will be releasing shortly with more info on the survey, the results and the demographics etc.
Your question about whether there is a difference between online facilitation and face-to-face facilitation is a great one. In many ways it gets down to the question of 'what are the essential skills of facilitation'?
I would say that the obvious big difference between f2f and online is the 'body' and 'presence' element involved in f2f. This to me is an enormous difference between the 2 environments. As we've found with our sociometry and action methods work, there is a huge difference between people raising their hand and asking a question, as opposed to bringing their body with the question within to a place of delivery.
What do you think?
Warm regards,
Andrew
Posted by: Andrew Rixon at November 16, 2006 8:32 AM
What would a facilitator who "holds the space" look like?
What metaphor would capture a graphic facilitator?
Posted by: Nancy White at November 18, 2006 5:56 AM
Hi Nancy,
Great questions.
Many of the facilitators who participated in our survey were open space facilitators. I wonder whether the theme of 'moving with the elements' is somehow representative of 'holding the space'?
In terms of graphic facilitators, I will be sure to ask some at the AFN conference in 9 sleeps time. :)
Warm regards,
Andrew
Posted by: Andrew Rixon at November 19, 2006 1:22 PM