« The role of metaphor in building an online community | Main | Combining a conference call, IM and a wiki »
| 28/06/05 | | The paradox of groups |
Heiko Rudolf put me on to Clay Shirky’s writing today and I was perusing some of his essays. I was struck by this quote from an essay called A Group Is Its Own Worst Enemy.
“It's obvious that there are no groups without members. But what's less obvious is that there are no members without a group. Because what would you be a member of?
So there's this very complicated moment of a group coming together, where enough individuals, for whatever reason, sort of agree that something worthwhile is happening, and the decision they make at that moment is: This is good and must be protected. And at that moment, even if it's subconscious, you start getting group effects. And the effects that we've seen come up over and over and over again in online communities.”
I know I’ve mentioned this before, so at the risk of boring people with repetition I will just say that getting ActKM going required us to manufacture conversation (we had a roster of posters) so it looked like something interesting was happening. It was only when we attracted about 100 members that the conversation was self sustaining. We then had a group people wanted to join.
Send this entry to:
Email this entry to a friend
View the Technorati Link Cosmos for this entry
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.anecdote.com.au/cgi-bin/mt-tback.cgi/105
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The paradox of groups:
» The paradox of groups from Quantum Gardener
Shawn Callahan writes I know I’ve mentioned this before, so at the risk of boring people with repetition I will just say that getting ActKM going required us to manufacture conversation (we had a roster of posters) so it looked like som... [Read More]
Tracked on July 5, 2005 11:05 PM